Psychological Evaluations for Franklin Hearings

Psychological Evaluations for Franklin Hearings

We get several requests from defense attorneys and non-profit firms representing offenders who have been given lengthy sentences or are serving juvenile LWOP (Life Without Parole) to complete a psychological evaluation to be reviewed at a future parole hearing or upcoming parole hearing and resentencing hearing for post-conviction cases. The recentness of Franklin Hearings poses many questions about how psychological evaluations are completed or used in a Franklin Hearing. A Franklin Hearing is a supplemental sentencing hearing for offenders who were under the age of twenty-six at the time of their offense. Essentially, offenders and their attorneys request an evaluation that addresses mitigating factors related to the offender’s youthfulness (age) at the time of the offense and produces a report detailing them. These youthfulness factors would then likely impact the length of their sentence or resentencing.

Juvenile Tyris Lamar Franklin was 16 years old when he shot and killed another teenager. A jury found him guilty and convicted him of first-degree murder with a firearm enhancement. California law required the trial court to impose two consecutive 25-year sentences. Franklin’s total sentence was life in prison with the possibility of parole after 50 years. After Franklin was sentenced, the Supreme Court held that his sentence violated the Eighth Amendment to the federal Constitution—the prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment, as indicated in Miller v. Alabama (2012). Miller v. Alabama (2012) prohibits a mandatory life without parole (LWOP) sentence for a juvenile offender who commits homicide. Franklin appeared, citing this case, among others, that supported the claim that his life sentence did not include judicial consideration of his youth and its relevance for sentencing. Ultimately, the Supreme Court ruled that an individual sentenced to a lengthy prison term for a crime committed while 26 or under must have had the opportunity to present, during trial, the mitigating evidence that would be relevant at a future parole hearing, even if the hearing is set to happen 10, 15, or 20 years from now. Therefore, a Franklin hearing is a special type of hearing in which an attorney requests to present mitigating factors that were never introduced at trial or during sentencing in the original case.

Purpose of a Psychological Evaluation for a Franklin Hearing

The purpose of a psychological evaluation at a Franklin Hearing is to provide a clinical picture of the offender and mitigating factors related to their youth for a future parole hearing or resentencing hearing. Potential mitigating factors include age at the time of the offense, cognitive and emotional immaturity, trauma history, neurodevelopmental disorders, psychiatric disorders, dysfunctional family dynamics, and diminished culpability compared to adults, to name a few. For offenders and attorneys seeking an evaluation for Franklin Hearing post-conviction cases, the expert will also consider any subsequent development and prosocial growth while in prison. Furthermore, if the offender has already spent significant time in prison, the attorney can ask the psychologist to address suitability for parole.

Attorney Considerations for Franklin Hearing Evaluations:

Do you want the evaluation and report to address all 5 Miller factors?

  1. Hallmark Features of Youth (chronological age, immaturity, failure to appreciate risks, etc.)
  2. Home and Family (environment, dysfunction, etc.)
  3. Circumstances of Crime/Peer Pressure
  4. Incompetencies of Youth (early entry and difficulties dealing with child welfare and probation systems, etc.)
  5. Evidence of Rehabilitation/Suitability for Parole (and the possibility of needing a risk assessment)

Do you want a limited-purpose evaluation focusing on the following:

  • Discussing adolescent brain development
  • Trauma and Adverse Childhood Experiences
  • Cognitive deficits and how they pertain to the Miller factors
  • Risk and Treatment (how prior treatments failed and why – perhaps they were not evidence-based or dose-dependent).
  • Address Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, Traumatic Brain Injury, or Substance Abuse and how these relate to the offense charged.

In sum, you select the referral question that will best assist you in your case. No matter what the exact referral question, we will focus on examining the concept of transient immaturity. Transient immaturity means we are assessing:

  • Adolescent Brain Development
  • Social Environment Factors
    • Trauma and its effects on the brain
  • The Crime Itself (psychosocial immaturity)
  • Ability to deal with counsel & police (psychosocial immaturity)
  • Evidence of Rehabilitation

Also, it is important to discuss with the psychologist whether they can discuss the facts of the case with the offender. It is most helpful if we can do so because we get more insight into their maturity/immaturity levels at the time of the offense.

Records that will be helpful in the evaluation:

  1. School records, including special education and IEP.
  2. Psychiatric/Treatment Records- outpatient therapy, inpatient (psychiatric hospitalization), crisis contacts, and medication.
  3. Developmental/Pediatric Records- particularly if there is a history of neurodevelopmental impairments.
  4. Medical Records- particularly if there is an indication of any injuries or medical problems.
  5. Child Welfare Records
  6. Probation and Parole Records, including transcripts from the trial or police reports and criminal history.

As a bonus, sending a list of collateral contacts (family, therapist, and treatment providers we can interview for additional information) will be most helpful. Alternatively, if you retain an investigator or forensic social worker to conduct these interviews, you are welcome to send the investigation reports once they are complete.

Screening instruments & assessment tools are essential and help us gather objective data to support the forensic opinions. We routinely use the following types of instruments when assessing juveniles/adults in transfer and Franklin cases. We are happy to discuss these in our consultation as well.

  1. Risk Assessment
  2. Test of Cognitive Abilities
  3. Effort/Motivation
  4. Psychopathy

Franklin/Miller (youthful offender) evaluations are becoming more popular due to the passage of Prop 57 and other resentencing statutes. Attorneys can find it challenging to determine how to use a psychological evaluation in these hearings. The most important thing is to have the evaluation address the offender’s possible transient immaturity. Next, decide whether you want the psychologist to review all mitigating Miller factors or prepare a more focused report. A consultation between the attorney and the psychologist can help flesh out the approach so the attorney can decide how best to represent their client at the hearing.

Dr. Pleshchuk specializes in completing youthful offender evaluations for Franklin and other resentencing hearings, including a comprehensive risk-for-future-violence assessment if needed.

Diagnostic Clarification and Treatment Planning

Psychological assessment can help guide the direction of therapy and provide focus for goal setting and treatment planning. Evaluations can involve tests that measure intelligence, achievement, cognitive functioning, and sometimes motor functioning. Although each test offers its own special type of information, together the test battery gives a full picture of a person’s functioning. The choice of tests used depends upon the question to be answered.

Achievement and Learning

Assessments of achievement and learning serve as a vital tools in identifying and understanding the needs and strength of individual students. Evaluations can be requested by parents, teachers and other school personnel to help promote effective learning and education development. Assessments and written reports offer a clear layout of individual strengths, areas of growth, and needs along with recommendations to help develop appropriate curriculum, educational planning and behavioral modifications.

The patient/client will not receive results, an interpretation of results, diagnostic opinions, or therapeutic recommendations directly. Such information may be included in a report sent to the requesting/paying party (attorney) and must be obtained directly through that party's usual and customary manner.

Forensic evaluations are conducted objectively and independently, regardless of which party retains Dr. Pleshchuk. Dr. Pleshchuk’s role is not to advocate for the defense, prosecution, plaintiff, or respondent, but to provide an impartial professional opinion based on the available information and appropriate psychological methods. Dr. Pleshchuk considers information that may support or challenge the referral question and clearly identifies the basis and limitations of my opinions. The goal is to provide the court and legal professionals with a thorough, balanced, and scientifically grounded assessment.

The records needed will depend on the type and purpose of the forensic evaluation. Relevant materials may include medical and mental health records, school records, employment records, legal and court documents, police reports, treatment records, prior evaluations, and other case-related documentation. Attorneys are encouraged to provide all records relevant to the referral question. Dr. Pleshchuk will review the available information carefully to determine what additional records or collateral information are needed to conduct a thorough, well-supported evaluation.

Dr. Pleshchuk is available to travel when a case requires in-person services, including evaluations, interviews, consultations, depositions, and court appearances. Travel arrangements depend on the location and specific needs of the case. Many services can also be conducted remotely when appropriate.

While Dr. Pleshchuk primarily works throughout Northern California, she can serve clients and legal professionals in all counties throughout California. Depending on the needs of the case, I may provide services remotely, allowing Dr. Pleshchuk to work with clients and attorneys statewide. Dr. Pleshchuk also provides forensic psychological services in New Hampshire.